Best 17 Hmr Ammo For Coyotes, How Many Hydrogen Atoms Are In One Mole Of Ch2cl2, Articles D

On June 4, 2003, our supreme court directed us to vacate our opinion in this case (204 Ill.2d 667, 273 Ill.Dec. People v. Feagans, 134 Ill.App.3d 252, 89 Ill.Dec. 509, 554 N.E.2d 444. During cross-examination, Cummings acknowledged that there was nothing in his investigation which would indicate that defendant had knowledge of, or assisted in, Sheila's plan to shoot McCoy. Who Is Da Brat's Father? David Ray McCoy Passed Away Early olivia rodrigo birth chart Contact me. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. 592, 610 N.E.2d 16 (1992). Shortly thereafter, one of the police officers punched him in his stomach and grabbed him by his hair, knocking his head into the wall. He died at the age of 52 years . This court recently addressed this issue. In the instant case, the defendant shot her live-in boyfriend by shooting him. All rights reserved. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. People v. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d 335, 347-48, 273 Ill.Dec. 604, 645 N.E.2d 856 (1994). 604], 645 N.E.2d at 865; see also People v. Huff, 308 Ill.App.3d 1046, 1049 [242 Ill.Dec. 829, 799 N.E.2d 694 (2003). Lying on the floor next to McCoy's head, police found a .25 caliber semi-automatic Beretta, later determined to be the weapon which caused McCoy's wounds. If this court did not previously consider a legal issue, and rule upon it, there can be no law of the case which successor Judge Urso should have heeded. (Emphasis in original.). In Crespo, the defendant stabbed the victim 24 times with an eight-inch knife and pulled her hair with such force that part of her scalp was torn from her head. ], [The following is unpublished under Supreme Court Rule 23.]. As for Anthony, the police picked him up after defendant falsely implicated him as being involved in the homicide. In his lengthy findings of facts, Judge Toomin first reiterated the theories raised in defendant's motion to suppress. 303, 585 N.E.2d 1325. david ray mccoy obituary chicagochris mccausland wife patricia. After the defense rested, the State objected to the admission of the medical records into evidence, on the ground that a proper foundation had not been laid. Justice DiVITO delivered the opinion of the court: After a bench trial, defendant Tyrone Daniels was found guilty of first degree murder (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. Anthony was bruised and bloody, apparently as a result of having been beaten. Ill. Rev.Stat.1985, ch. We stated that, Pursuant to Hobley II, defendant's argument fails. david ray mccoy net worth - attitudesinreverse.org As for the voluntariness of her confession, Judge Toomin, citing People v. Dodds, 190 Ill.App.3d 1083, 138 Ill.Dec. Again, the record does not support defendant's assertion. HARTMAN, P.J., and SCARIANO, J. Six days later, Daniels was arrested after the murder weapon, a .25-caliber Beretta, was traced to her. Similarly, defendant argues the trial court should have admitted the medical records in this case because they supported her claim of self-defense in that they related to her state of mind at the time she shot McCoy. The special circumstances present in Jones was the fact that the appellate court had previously reversed the defendant's conviction and held that the trial court's denial of a motion to suppress as to one of three statements was erroneous. Prior to her first trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress written and oral statements. Defendant argues that Sheila's statement "figured prominently" in the court's determination and thus, because that statement was "admitted solely due to defense counsel's efforts[,] obviously defendant has been deprived of effective assistance of counsel.". by January 24, 2023 sanford bishop wife. Counsel further explained that Anthony's testimony, which Judge Toomin had precluded at the previous hearing, would also be presented. The morning she testified at her trial, defendant went to the hospital and obtained the records relating to the beating. The Tragic Story, Why Millionaire Dad Of Lisa Raye & Da Brat Was The sequence of events relating to the arrests of Anthony and Tyrone as recited in Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333-34, 208 Ill.Dec. David Ray McCoy Met His Demise at the Hands of His Then-Girlfriend Da Brat's father met his untimely death aged 52. People v. Cannon, 150 Ill.App.3d 1009, 1024-25, 104 Ill.Dec. Defendant then took the gun away from his sister and put it in his pocket. In general, under the law of the case doctrine, a rule established as controlling in a particular case will continue to be the law of the case, provided the facts remain the same. Shortly after arriving at the police station, the detectives confronted defendant with the fact that she owned the gun. WOMAN GETS 80 YEARS IN 1988 SLAYING - Chicago Tribune 887, 743 N.E.2d 1043 (2001). In People v. Maxwell, 173 Ill.2d 102, 219 Ill.Dec. Defendant argues next that recent case law and significant changes regarding the voluntariness of a defendant's confessions require a hearing on her motion to suppress. [The preceding is unpublished under Supreme Court Rule 23.]. McCoy's then 32 year old live-in girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her then 20 year old brother, Tyrone, were convicted of McCoy's murder in 1990. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224 (1994) (Daniels I). In rejecting the State's argument, this court relied on the holding of our supreme court in People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 150 Ill.Dec. Following a second jury trial, where defendant's statements to police were again admitted, defendant was found guilty of first degree murder. Aug. 13, 1997: WOMAN CONVICTED AGAIN IN SLAYING - Chicago Tribune 447, 548 N.E.2d 1003 (1989). She said, I told them what happened and just tell them what happened, tell them the truth." He was 52 years old at the time. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224. The section of Cleary and Graham defendant relies upon relates to the personal knowledge requirement of testifying witnesses, not the requirements of admission of medical records. 453, 685 N.E.2d 908 (1997). Following a jury trial in 1990 before Judge Michael P. Toomin, defendant Sheila Daniels was convicted of the first degree murder of her paraplegic boyfriend, David McCoy, and was sentenced to an 80-year prison term.1 On appeal, with one justice dissenting, this court ruled, inter alia, that the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress statements, but reversed defendant's conviction, finding the admission of polygraph results at her trial improper. Considering the facts of the instant case, we simply cannot say that the State has meet its burden to show that the evidence was so overwhelming that the crime was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty so that we have no doubt that a jury would have made this finding. At no time in the apartment did the police advise him of his constitutional rights. at 1527, 128 L.Ed.2d at 296. In Stansbury, prior to trial, the defendant moved to have statements he made while at the police station suppressed because at the time they were made, he was in custody, but had not been advised of his Miranda rights. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicagosteve jacobson fairway net worth. She alleged that police informed her that they would continue beating Tyrone and might even subject her to physical cruelty unless she made admissions relating to her involvement in McCoy's murder. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 386 [206 Ill.Dec. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago Secondly, the two-step analysis the Court set out in Thompson was the law in Illinois at the time Judge Toomin ruled upon defendant's motion to suppress. Their beloved father was a paraplegic who was also a wellestablished Southside Chicago businessman. In this appeal, he contends that he was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel (1) allegedly failed to effectively present his motion to suppress statements; (2) allegedly failed to effectively argue the applicable law regarding accountability; (3) successfully obtained the admission into evidence of the extrajudicial statement of Sheila Daniels, a codefendant; and (4) allegedly refused to permit him to testify at trial. In People v. Patterson, 192 Ill.2d 93, 249 Ill.Dec. This court affirmed Justice Toomin's denial of defendant's motion to suppress and therefore addressed defendant's fourth and fifth amendment rights. target_type: 'mix' 457, 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995), her original motion to suppress would have been granted. 267, 480 N.E.2d 153 (1985). AIR Awareness Outreach; AIR Business Lunch & Learn; AIR Community of Kindness; AIR Dogs: Paws For Minds AIR Hero AIR & NJAMHAA Conference 356, 547 N.E.2d 523 (1989), and People v. Nicholls, 42 Ill.2d 91, 245 N.E.2d 771 (1969), ruled that defendant's confession was voluntary. 9-1(a)), armed robbery (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 1827, 1838, 144 L.Ed.2d 35, 53 (1999). Upon the City's motion for reconsideration, the trial court, finding that defendant was undertaking a fishing expedition, granted the City's motion to quash the subpoenas. M. Graham, Cleary & Graham's Handbook of Illinois Evidence 803.11, at 830 (7th ed.1999). Defendant maintains that his trial counsel made "outlandish" arguments to the effect that defendant could not have killed McCoy because Sheila's gunshot had already killed him. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, Crespo, 203 Ill.2d at 348-49, 273 Ill.Dec. In an unpublished portion of the opinion issued by this court on June 28, 2002, we vacated the defendant's 80-year extended term sentence based on the trial court's finding that the offense was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty, we remanded the case for re-sentencing. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the defendant was granted a new trial, where he again moved to suppress statements, arguing now that he could prove other suspects had also been tortured at Area 2. 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.1(a)(4), (a)(8) (West 1996). David Ray McCoy Will, Family Tree, Funeral, Daughters, Net Worth At Consequently, we find that defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of trial counsel by his counsel's failure to present the argument that defendant was psychologically influenced by his sister. 69, 538 N.E.2d 444 (1988); People v. Mitchell, 297 Ill.App.3d 206, 209, 231 Ill.Dec. Contact us. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion. (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690, 104 S.Ct. The Williams court stated: [N]one of our Taylor line of cases limited the Taylor rule only to those subsidiary issues that may actually have been considered by a judge whose appealable order a judge of coordinate authority later undertakes to modify. McCoys then 32 year old live-in girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her then 20 year old brother, Tyrone, were convicted of McCoys murder in 1990. At that time, he had a girlfriend named Shiela Daniels. Sheila Daniels, 41, first convicted in 1990, was ordered retried two years ago by the Illinois Appellate Court after the defense complained of prosecutorial misconduct. We have vacated our prior opinion in a separate order and we determine that our prior decision to vacate the defendant's extended-term sentence was proper. There, our supreme court reversed the defendant's murder conviction based on the prosecutor's improper cross-examination. Defendant then took the gun away from his sister and put it in his pocket. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago. He was born on March 6, 1935 in Pearl River County, Mississippi, United States to Jesse McCoy (1897-1967) and Violee Byrd McCoy (1901-1991). Specifically, defendant asserts that his trial counsel erroneously presented a coercion and physical abuse theory during the suppression hearing, rather than the more "viable" theory that defendant was influenced or controlled by his older sister. Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill.2d 186, 192, 49 Ill.Dec. 343, 795 N.E.2d 1011 (2003) and People v. Alvarez, 344 Ill.App.3d 179, 278 Ill.Dec. People v. Daniels, 230 Ill. App. 3d 527 | Casetext Search + Citator Defendant admitted this but said that her brother Anthony had stolen it from her and she gave the detectives his address. The trial testimony of Anna Democopoulos, the assistant State's Attorney who interviewed defendant, essentially corroborated Cummings' testimony. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. 2052, 2065; People v. Whittaker (1990), 199 Ill.App.3d 621, 627, 145 Ill.Dec. window._taboola = window._taboola || []; 20, 595 N.E.2d 83 (1992). See also People v. Watts (1992), 226 Ill.App.3d 519, 168 Ill.Dec. The supreme court reversed that determination and granted the defendant a hearing on his petition. However, during an episode of Lisa Rayesprior reality show,she cried uncontrollably as she and her daughter visited her dads grave site. Absent an abuse of discretion, this court will not reverse the trial court's determination with respect to the admission of exhibits into evidence. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224, is helpful to an analysis of this issue. In People v. Cannon, 293 Ill.App.3d 634, 227 Ill.Dec. This new evidence would not cure defendant's inability to establish that he sustained an injury. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d at 625, 236 Ill.Dec. While defendant did testify at her motion to suppress that she saw Anthony injured in the police station before she gave a statement to the polygraph operator, she never asserted that this fact influenced her decision to confess. He was handcuffed tightly to the wall and was not allowed to go to the washroom. They reportedly then drove McCoys body in his Cadillac to the alley and left him thereso sad. In Thompson, the Supreme Court held that a state court's determination as to whether a suspect was in custody while being interrogated for purposes of Miranda was not entitled to a statutory presumption of correctness during federal habeas corpus review, but was a mixed question of law and fact warranting independent review by a federal habeas court. According to Chicago Tribune, three of McCoys other daughters, Jehlan, Morgan, and Cynthia, believe Daniels killed their father because she found out he was about to cut her out of his will. Defendant first contends that Judge Urso erred in denying her a hearing on her motions to suppress filed after this court's decision in Daniels I. David was found dead in 1988 in the back seat of his car. Thereafter, defendant drove McCoy's car to an alley near McCoy's place of business, with Sheila following in her own car. Defendant testified at her suppression hearing before Judge Toomin that she had seen Anthony while at the police station and he appeared to have been beaten. On November 18, 1988, shortly after speaking with Sheila, police arrested defendant. The supreme court affirmed this denial, stating, The defendant could have raised these arguments in his first appeal, and his failure to do so justified the trial court's refusal to reconsider its rulings, under principles of collateral estoppel. Enis, 163 Ill.2d at 386, 206 Ill.Dec. See People v. Chengary, 301 Ill.App.3d 895, 897, 235 Ill.Dec. In Thurow, our supreme court held that, in those cases where the defendant did object to his sentence in the circuit court, the reviewing court should apply a harmless error analysis: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant guilty absent the error. Thurow, 203 Ill.2d at 368-69 [272 Ill.Dec. ace school of tomorrow answer keys . We do not dispute that a change in the law is an exception to application of the law of the case doctrine. Choices which are made on the basis of strategic considerations after a thorough investigation of all matters relevant to plausible options have traditionally been considered to be unchallengeable. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Each of the Taylor line of cases speaks of an order itself, not merely of issues upon which the order may or may not have turned. Williams, 138 Ill.2d at 390-91, 150 Ill.Dec. *, concur. 604, 645 N.E.2d 856. Defendant's conviction arose from the November 12, 1988, shooting death of McCoy in the garage of the home that he, defendant and her daughter shared at 1654 East 92nd Street in Chicago. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. 12, 751 N.E.2d 65 (2001). There are variousreports of the motive behind McCoys murder. Anthony was questioned and released. The supreme court cited two facts which have been found to be special circumstances supporting a trial court's decision to hold new de novo hearings on motions to suppress after remand. Accordingly, we find that defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel due to his attorney successfully obtaining the admission of Sheila's statement. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png. 12, 735 N.E.2d 616. Screen Printing and Embroidery for clothing and accessories, as well as Technical Screenprinting, Overlays, and Labels for industrial and commercial applications Da Brat was born on April 14, 1974, as Shawntae Harris in Joliet, Illinois and was raised on the West Side of Chicago, Illinois. 604], 645 N.E.2d at 865. (People v. Dredge (1986), 148 Ill.App.3d 911, 913, 102 Ill.Dec. In support of her claim of error, defendant relies upon a series of cases mentioning a report (Goldston Report) of the Office of Professional Standards (OPS) summarizing allegations gleaned from other reports concerning allegations of the systematic abuse of prisoners at Area 2 between the years of 1978 and 1986. At 11:40 p.m., defendant was advised of her Miranda rights and agreed to take a polygraph exam, which lasted about 21/212 hours. See 188 Ill.2d R. 341(e)(7); People v. Madej, 177 Ill.2d 116, 162, 226 Ill.Dec. People v. Fields, 258 Ill.App.3d 912, 918, 197 Ill.Dec. Who Is Da Brat's Father? David Ray McCoy Passed Away Early This argument is without merit. 553, 696 N.E.2d 849 (1998). 688], 721 N.E.2d 1219, 1221 (1999), [judgment vacated by People v. Huff, 195 Ill.2d 87 [253 Ill.Dec. New theories supporting suppression do not constitute additional evidence that has become available since the first hearing to suppress. Hattery, 183 Ill.App.3d at 805-06, 132 Ill.Dec. Consequently, we affirm our prior order vacating defendant's extended-term sentence and remanding this case to the trial court for resentencing. In support of her claim of error, defendant relies upon People v. Greenspawn, 346 Ill. 484, 179 N.E. In People v. Hattery, 183 Ill.App.3d 785, 805-06, 132 Ill.Dec. In fact, the motion to suppress at issue in Daniels I makes no mention of Tyrone's or Anthony's condition as a basis for defendant's statements. Thus, we cannot say that the trial court's granting of the City's motion to quash the subpoenas was in error. Following a jury trial in 1990 before Judge Michael P. Toomin, defendant Sheila Daniels was convicted of the first degree murder of her paraplegic boyfriend, David McCoy, and was sentenced to an 80-year prison term. Defendant did not assert this as a ground for suppressing her statement until her first amended motion before Judge Urso. 1000, 688 N.E.2d 693. As the State properly asserts, this court is unable, based upon the record, to determine the merits of defendant's claim. David Ray McCoy Cause Of Death - vimbuzz.com 64, 762 N.E.2d 633 (2001), the first trial court granted the defendant's motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence on the ground that the defendant had been arrested without probable cause. 154, 704 N.E.2d 727 (1998). In reliance upon Cannon, Patterson and King, defendant argues the OPS report constitutes new evidence, entitling her to a hearing on her reoffered amended motion to suppress. [Editor's Note: Text omitted pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23. Owned motels and nightclubs in Chicago. Presiding Justice QUINN delivered the opinion of the court: The email address cannot be subscribed. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d at 622, 236 Ill.Dec. Da Brat Bio, Wiki, Net Worth, Dating, Partner, Married, Age, Height 499, 734 N.E.2d 207 (2000), where this court stated: [P]rinciples of collateral estoppel do not bar relitigation of a pretrial ruling after remand, where special circumstances are present. 0. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago. Maxwell, 173 Ill.2d at 120-21, 219 Ill.Dec. The court ordered an in camera inspection of records naming officers in relevant police reports, who had complaints of physical abuse or civil lawsuits for abuse filed against them. 143, 706 N.E.2d 1017 (1998), this court addressed the defendant's contention on appeal that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction petition because he had new evidence which showed systematic torture at Area 2. Similarly, in Hinton, this court rejected the defendant's argument that the postconviction court erred in quashing his subpoenas requesting any complaints involving excessive force against the officers identified in the defendant's case. Despite the presence of this fact, which was known to defendant at her first trial, she did not assert it as a reason for suppression before Judge Toomin. The court also found that probable cause existed after defendant spoke with the polygraph operator and admitted knowledge of the murder. It is improper for the jury to take items with them to the jury room during deliberations which have not been admitted into evidence. Defendant then took the gun away from his sister and put it in his pocket. David Ray McCoy was an American businessman and millionaire. The proffered testimony of Tyrone and Anthony was included with the motion, substantiating the allegations of abuse contained in defendant's motion. Cummings again advised defendant of his rights and interviewed him for approximately 45 minutes. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago - vcasket.com Categories . 38, par. When he asked who it was, the police identified themselves and told him to open the door and let them in. Although the OPS report citing police misconduct at Area 2 has been brought to light since the time defendant and her brothers were questioned there, that does not alter the fact that defendant did not raise the issue of police brutality as a basis for suppression until years later. }); Copyright 2015 . People v. Patterson, 154 Ill.2d 414, 468, 182 Ill.Dec. On appeal, this court rejected the defendant's argument which we characterized as being based on a claim of new evidence. 1. In so ruling, the Court stated that the ultimate determination for whether a defendant is in custody for Miranda purposes involved [t]wo discrete inquiries ***: first, what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and second, given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave. Thompson, 516 U.S. at 112, 116 S.Ct. Defendant then emptied McCoy's wallet of money, and dumped it in a trash bin at a McDonald's restaurant. Aug. 13, 1997: WOMAN CONVICTED AGAIN IN SLAYING In fact, the section of Cleary and Graham relating to the admission of medical and hospital records explains that while the requirement of calling all persons who made the entries to testify has virtually disappeared with respect to the admission of business records, it continues to be applied to medical records. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385. In addition to what he had told Cummings, defendant told her that Sheila and McCoy had been arguing when Sheila accidentally shot McCoy. 9-3.1(a)); he was subsequently sentenced to concurrent terms of 60 years' imprisonment for first degree murder, 20 years for armed robbery, and five years for concealment of a homicidal death. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224. Daniels. He was shot. DAVID RAY MCCOY - We Africa Preview The trial court denied admission of the records. This court rejected all of these arguments, finding that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 336, 208 Ill.Dec. There, the defendant had asserted in his motion to suppress that he had been beaten by the police. 64, 762 N.E.2d 633. At the age of 53, David Ray Mccoy was brutally murdered in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, on November 13, 1988. He testified that the gun found near McCoy's body was eventually traced to Sheila Daniels, who, when questioned by the police, told them that defendant had killed McCoy; later, she led the police to defendant's apartment. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 69, 538 N.E.2d 444. The circuit court expressly found that she was not arrested or seized in her home, but instead voluntarily accompanied the officers to the police station. 698, 557 N.E.2d 468.) The subpoenas also sought official police photographs of all officers on duty at Area 2 during the time she was interrogated in connection with McCoy's murder. Defendant then asked to see his sister, who was brought into the room. Defendant makes much about the fact that the jury wanted to review the medical records, arguing that because the jurors were denied access to the records, they probably believed defendant was lying about the beating and therefore, convicted her for that reason. As pointed out earlier, this is an entirely new theory raised by defendant after the denial of her first motion to suppress and affirmance on appeal of that denial. After the trial court denied defendant's amended motion to quash arrest and suppress statements, she was granted leave to file an amended motion to suppress statements. Based on that statement, she considered him to be her attorney. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 332, 208 Ill.Dec. After discussing the fourth amendment issue, Judge Toomin continued: The other ground that the court notes from the motion is centered in both the 5th and 6th Amendments alleging a denial of her right to have an opportunity to consult with counsel, coupled with repeated questioning of her over a long period of time during which she was allegedly held incommunicad [o] *** and also that her will was overborne and she was impliedly coerced by the detective involved here., After a very lengthy recitation of defendant's testimony at the evidentiary hearing, Judge Toomin specifically said that defendant testified she was questioned repeatedly, though she asked to call Edward Vrdolyak [sic] who she considered to be her attorney.. The doctrine, however, merely expresses the practice of courts generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided; it is not a limit on their power. Patterson, 154 Ill.2d at 468-69, 182 Ill.Dec. (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. Consequently, Judge Toomin did not allow Anthony to testify during the hearing on that motion. In the present cause, the order was to quash an arrest and suppress evidence, period. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333, 208 Ill.Dec. Sheila Daniels, 41, first convicted in 1990, was. The trial court responded that the records were not available and instructed the jury to continue deliberating. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385 (1990). Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions. A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another when either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate such commission, he solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid the other person in the planning or commission of the offense. David was a successful businessman and owned many hotels and nightclubs. After hearing argument on the City's motion, the trial court quashed defendant's subpoena seeking photographs of the officers assigned to Area 2 at the time she was questioned there. Daniels, 230 Ill.App.3d at 532, 172 Ill.Dec. The motion was denied and our supreme court affirmed that ruling. 18-2(a)), and concealment of a homicidal death (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. Tyrone claimed he shotMcCoy only after his sister, Sheila, delivered the fatal shot to McCoys head. Defendant has cited no authority in support of this claim and it is therefore waived.